Matter Timelines

From instruction to close.

One timeline per matter.Firm and client see the same view, in real time.

donna — Peterson v Oakwood

Negotiation·Step 3 of 6·2 complete·due Apr 8

Contract Review
SC
Due Diligence
JW
Negotiation
due Apr 8
SC
Signing
due Apr 14
RH
Settlement
due Apr 21
JW
Matter Close
SC

Step 3 of 6

Negotiation

In Progress
SC
Sarah Chen·Due Apr 8
D

Signing deadline in 6 days — Negotiation step still in progress.

One timeline per matter

Every step. Every person. Every deadline.

Each step has an owner and a date. Nothing slips because everyone sees it.

Timeline

Peterson v Oakwood

Progress2 / 6 steps complete
Contract Review
Done
SC
Due Diligence
Done
JW
Negotiation
Apr 8
SC
Signing
Apr 14
RH
Settlement
Apr 21
JW
Matter Close
SC

Step at a glance

Click a step.Everything’s there.

Whoever picks it up knows exactly what to do.

Step 3 of 6

Negotiation

In ProgressSarah Chen
Due 8 Apr 2026

Description

Review Oakwood's counter-proposals and prepare our response to the amended terms. Focus on indemnity clauses and IP assignment provisions flagged in Due Diligence.

Links

Sale of Goods Act — Implied Terms (s 14)

legislation.gov

Contract Law — Indemnity Clause Reference

lawcommission.gov

Attachments

PDF

Term_Sheet_v2.pdf

84 KB · ↑ Sarah Chen

PDF

Oakwood_Counter_Proposal.pdf

112 KB · ↑ James Walsh

Less chasing. More closing.

Your matters don't wait. Neither should your team.